Nursing 33 Clinical Views

mind map: | Nursing

Clinical Requirement:

MindMapinstructions.docx Mind Map This week, you have your first mind map assignment. The focus will be cardiovascular disorders. Within the assignment, you will see a list of disorders to choose from. You will pick one topic and create a mind map. You can use any template for the mind map and some examples have been provided for you in this week's learning resources. Some key points to remember when completing this assignment:  1. Ensure that you follow the rubric and address all sections.  2. Once you complete the mind map and submit the assignment, it is your responsibility to ensure that I can open it and read it clearly. Make sure that the text is large enough and it does not link to a site needing a log in. If I can't read the text or access the assignment, I will add a comment in the grading section and it will need to be resubmitted. The resubmission will have the grade deducted per policy.  3. This assignment must be in the form of a mindmap. If it is turned in as an essay, it will not be graded and you will receive a comment to resubmit as a mindmap.  Required Resources · Rogers, J. (2023).  McCance & Huether's pathophysiology  (9th ed.). Elsevier – Evolve. · Chapter 31: Structure and Function of the Cardiovascular and Lymphatic Systems · Chapter 32: Alterations of Cardiovascular Function · Chapter 33: Alterations of Cardiovascular Function in Children · Braun, L. (2024, September 24).  Pathophysiology concept mapLinks to an external site. Links to an external site.Links to an external site.. Care Patron. https://www.carepatron.com/templates/pathophysiology-concept-map Mind Mapping websites - Free Templates: · MindmeisterLinks to an external site.Links to an external site.. (n.d.). https://mindmeister.com · Creately.Links to an external site.Links to an external site. (n.d.). https://creately.com · CanvaLinks to an external site.Links to an external site.. (n.d.).  https://canva.comLinks to an external site.Links to an external site. Required Media · Stone, J. (2024).  Mind mapping: Understanding advanced pathophysiology for the APRN studentLinks to an external site. Links to an external site.Links to an external site.. Canva. https://www.canva.com/design/DAGSVYSqELE/-B0IoK4WLywd5DShmsuCWQ/edit?utm_content=DAGSVYSqELE&utm_campaign=designshare&utm_medium=link2&utm_source=sharebutton · HBN Infotech - Tutorials. (2023, April 23).  5 mind map design ideas in MS Word - Mind map Word template - Mind map in Word documentLinks to an external site. Links to an external site.Links to an external site. [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/IcyeCFbQO-M?si=-MJWFdnCYhZ1mn0k rubric.docx NURS_6501_Week 3, 7, 9_Mind Map Assignment_Rubric NURS_6501_Week 3, 7, 9_Mind Map Assignment_Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelect one of the possible topics provided and complete the MindMap. Describe the Pathophysiology and Etiology of the primary diagnosis. List risk factors related to the primary diagnosis. 30 to >27.0 ptsExcellentA thoroughly completed MindMap with a selected topic was submitted. The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the pathophysiology at the cellular level and shows understanding of the primary diagnosis. The response accurately and thoroughly identifies etiology for the diagnosis and lists appropriate risk factors. 27 to >23.0 ptsGoodA completed MindMap with a selected topic was submitted. The response describes the pathophysiology at the organ level of the primary diagnosis. The response does not identify specific etiology for the diagnosis and some risk factors are not linked to diagnosis. 23 to >19.0 ptsFairAn inaccurately complete or vague MindMap with a selected topic was submitted. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis. The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies etiology for the diagnosis and all risk factors are not linked to diagnosis. 19 to >0 ptsPoorAn incomplete MindMap with a selected topic was submitted, or is missing. The response does not describe the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis. The response does not identify etiology for this diagnosis and risk factors are missing. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat are the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis? How does the diagnosis impact other body systems and what are the possible complications? 20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the patient's signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications. 17 to >14.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately describes the patient's signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response accurately describes how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications. 14 to >12.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely describes the patient's signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications. 12 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely describes the patient's signs and symptoms for this diagnosis, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes how the diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications, or is missing. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat diagnostic tests or labs would you order to confirm the primary diagnosis? 20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the diagnostic tests and labs to order for primary diagnosis and are appropriately linked within the Mind map. 17 to >14.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the diagnostic tests and labs to order for primary diagnosis but are not appropriately linked within the Mind map. 14 to >12.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely describes the diagnostic tests and labs to order for primary diagnosis and are not linked within the Mind map. 12 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely describes the diagnostic tests and labs to order for primary diagnosis. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat treatment options would you consider? Include possible referrals and medications. 20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the treatment options they would consider. The response accurately and thoroughly describes potential referrals and medications. 17 to >14.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately describes the treatment options they would consider. The response accurately describes potential referrals and medications. 14 to >12.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely describes the treatment options they would consider. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes potential referrals and medications. 12 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely describes the treatment options they would consider, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes possible referrals and medications, or is missing. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources and Mind map formatting/writing 10 to >7.0 ptsExcellentThe response is articulate with demonstration of advanced terms and knowledge in writing style with no grammatical or spelling errors. Appropriate electronic mind mapping format. Reference list included with at least two research articles that are within last 5 years. Research articles are also cited and linked within mind map. 7 to >4.0 ptsGoodThe response is efficient with correct spelling and no gross grammatical and/or spelling errors. Appropriate electronic mind mapping format. Reference list included with at least two research articles within last 5 years but not cited or linked within mind map. 4 to >2.0 ptsFairThe response is fair with a few spelling and grammatical errors. Appropriate electronic mind mapping format. Reference list included with at least two research articles but not within last 5 years and not cited or linked within mind map. 2 to >0 ptsPoorThe response is poor with gross grammatical and spelling errors. Did not use appropriate electronic mind mapping format. Did not include reference list with at least two research articles. 10 pts Total Points: 100
Expert Clinical Solution Preview for mind map:  | Nursing

Unlock Full Solution

100% RN Verified & Plagiarism Free

APA 7th Format RN Peer Reviewed HIPAA Secure

Why order your Nursing paper here?

  • Clinical Accuracy
    Written by experts who understand nursing care models.
  • Save 40+ Hours
    Focus on your clinicals while we handle the research.
  • Perfect APA Citation
    Never lose marks for formatting or in-text citations.
  • BSN/MSN/DNP Proof
    High-level academic language suitable for your degree.

Nursing Help FAQ: Nursing

How is a nursing research paper different from regular essays?

Nursing papers, especially in Nursing, require a heavy focus on Evidence-Based Practice (EBP). This means using peer-reviewed clinical journals (less than 5 years old), adhering strictly to APA 7th edition, and demonstrating how theory applies to clinical patient outcomes.

Can you write my DNP Capstone or MSN Thesis?

Yes. We have a dedicated team for doctoral and master's level nursing work. We help with PICO-T development, methodology chapters, and comprehensive literature reviews that meet university-level rigor.

What if I need my nursing paper in APA 7 format?

APA 7th edition is our default clinical language. We ensure perfect title pages, running heads, headings (Levels 1-5), and a comprehensive reference list with active DOIs.

Related Clinical Studies

Case: Nursing

My topic that i chose is abortion

Read/review the following resources for this activity: Textbook: Chapters 9, 10 Lesson Minimum of 5 scholarly sources (in addition to the textbook) Instructions First, return to your topic chosen in the week three assignment. Answer this question: What are the personal and/or communal ethical factors that may be involved in determining the moral position of either side in that debate? Next, articulate and then evaluate the ethical positions  using Kantian ethics (that is, the categorical impe...

Case: Nursing

MMPA D1: follow all directions | Nursing

follow all directions evalutionmethods.docx When thinking about making positive social change in an organization, the need to consider the levels of strategic planning and performance improvement will dictate what is required to impact positive social change. For this Discussion, you create and post one evidence-based performance improvement strategy to support social change for a specific nonprofit or public/government organization. When looking for a nonprofit or public/government organizatio...

Case: Nursing

Autisim: | Nursing

AutismDisorder.docx Diagnosis:  Autism Spectrum Disorder   Prepare a study guide for your disorder-Autism Spectrum Disorder . This should be in the form of an outline with references, and you should incorporate visual elements such as concept maps, charts, diagrams, images, color coding, mnemonics, and/or flashcards. Be creative! It should not be in the format of an APA paper. Your guide should be informed by the DSM-5-TR but also supported by at least three other scholarly resource...

Case: Nursing

CASE STUDY: | Nursing

CASESTUDY.docx Working Through COMMON Pregnancy Case Studies and Other Issues in Advanced Nursing Practice The Assignment for this week is to provide you an opportunity to analyze one of five case studies provided.  These case studies involve common pregnancy and psychosocial issues encountered in advanced nursing primary care practice. You will use the case study template under weekly resources to develop your assignment. Resources Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing...

Case: Nursing

Theory discussion : Post a summary of your experience in... | Nursing

Post a summary of your experience in beginning your literature search and assess your initial progress. Explain what is working for you in terms of a plan or search strategy for finding relevant, current literature, including Walden Library support resources you would recommend. Explain issues of concern and specific questions regarding the search process. References and citations are not required. Learning Resources Required Readings Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Wale...

Case: Nursing

Mod 7 Pds L Discussion: Approaches to Disease Management:... | Nursing

Approaches to Disease Management: Vaginal Discharge After studying Module 7: Lecture Materials & Resources, discuss the following: A 6-year-old has a yellow vaginal discharge. The examination is otherwise normal. What are key points in the history and physical examination? How would you approach differ if the patient were a sexually active 16-year-old? What are similarities and differences in the approach? Submission Instructions:****Post should be 500 words, in current APA style with at lea...

Case: Nursing

6 5550: answer. 2 referent | Nursing

answer. 2 referent 65550CaseStudyModule6MSN5550.pdf MSN 5550 Health Promotion: Prevention of Disease Case Study Module 6 Instructions: Read the following case study and answer the reflective questions. Please provide evidence-based rationales for your answers. APA, 7th ed. must be followed. Due: Saturday by 23:59 pm CASE STUDY: Albert Albert Mitchell is a 36-year-old man who will be traveling to Dubai to give a business presentation in 3 months. Although he has traveled wi...

Case: Nursing

unit 6 journal: see attached | Nursing

see attached unit6journalinstructions.docx .  Overview of an Episodic Exam Question How do acute cases differ from chronic cases in primary care? Where to Post Response You will post this response to the online Journal. However, please write your response in Word or another text tool and save your work. When you are ready to post, copy your response text and paste it into the online Journal. This approach will ensure that you have a backup of your work. Submit the completed Journal paper...

Case: Nursing

see below: see below   see below KE 4020... | Nursing

see below   see below KE 4020 assessment 1 For this assessment, you will develop a 3–5 page paper that examines a safety quality issue in a health care setting. You will analyze the issue and examine potential evidence-based and best-practice solutions from the literature as well as the role of nurses and other stakeholders in addressing the issue. Collapse All Introduction Health care organizations and professionals strive to create safe environments for patients; however, due to the complexity...