orge class : | Nursing

Clinical Requirement:

otherclass.docx THE ROLE OF THE NURSE INFORMATICIST IN SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION Assume you are a nurse manager on a unit where a new nursing documentation system is to be implemented. You want to ensure that the system will be usable and acceptable for the nurses impacted. You realize a nurse leader must be on the implementation team. RESOURCES Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.  WEEKLY RESOURCES To Prepare: · Review the steps of the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) and reflect on the scenario presented. · Consider the benefits and challenges associated with involving a nurse leader on an implementation team for health information technology. The Assignment: (2-3 pages not including the title and reference page) In preparation of filling this role, develop a 2- to 3-page role description for a graduate-level nurse to guide his/her participation on the implementation team. The role description should be based on the SDLC stages and tasks and should clearly define how this individual will participate in and impact each of the following steps: · Planning and requirements definition · Analysis · Design of the new system · Implementation · Post-implementation support · Use APA format and include a title page and reference page. · Use the Safe Assign Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work. BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 10 Submit your completed Role Description.   SUBMISSION INFORMATION Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the  Turnitin Drafts from the  Start Here area.  1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as  WK10Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial 2. Then, click on  Start Assignment near the top of the page. 3. Next, click on  Upload File and select  Submit Assignment for review. Rubric NURS_5051_Module05_Week10_Assignment_Rubric NURS_5051_Module05_Week10_Assignment_Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 2- to 3-page role description for a graduate-level nurse to guide his/her participation on the implementation team. The role description should be based on the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) stages and tasks and should clearly define how this individual will participate in and impact each of the following steps:·   Planning and requirements definition·   Analysis·   Design of the new system·   Implementation·   Post-implementation support 25 to >22.0 pts Excellent Using the literature and course resources:...An accurate and fully developed role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: definition of planning and requirements. 22 to >19.0 pts Good Using the literature and course resources:...A role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: definition of planning and requirements. 19 to >17.0 pts Fair The response elements are superficially addressed. 17 to >0 pts Poor The response is incomplete, inaccurate, or missing. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Analysis· Design of the new system 25 to >22.0 pts Excellent Using the literature and course resources:...An accurate and fully developed role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: analysis and design of the new system. 22 to >19.0 pts Good Using the literature and course resources:...A role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: analysis and design of the new system. 19 to >17.0 pts Fair The response elements are superficially addressed. 17 to >0 pts Poor The response is incomplete, inaccurate, or missing. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Implementation· Post-implementation support 25 to >22.0 pts Excellent Using the literature and course resources:...An accurate and fully developed role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: implementation and post-implementation support. 22 to >19.0 pts Good Using the literature and course resources:...A role description is provided that supports the role of the nurse informaticist on the Systems Development Life Cycle stages including how the individual will participate and impact each of these steps: implementation and post-implementation support. 19 to >17.0 pts Fair The response elements are superficially addressed. 17 to >0 pts Poor The response is incomplete, inaccurate, or missing 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources 10 to >8.0 pts Excellent Assignment includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed articles and 2 or more course resources. 8 to >7.0 pts Good Assignment includes: 2 peer-reviewed articles and 2 course resources. 7 to >6.0 pts Fair Assignment includes: 1 peer-reviewed article and 1 course resource. 6 to >0 pts Poor Assignment includes: 1 or no resources. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. 4 to >3.0 pts Good Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. 3 to >2.0 pts Fair Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. 2 to >0 pts Poor Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 to >3.0 pts Good Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 to >2.0 pts Fair Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 2 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct APA format with no errors. 4 to >3.0 pts Good Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. 3 to >2.0 pts Fair Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. 2 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. 5 pts Total Points: 100