Risk Management Analysis 2

Clinical Requirement:

see attachments Benchmark2instructions.docx The purpose of this assignment is to analyze how an organization's quality and improvement processes contribute to its risk management program. This assignment builds on the concepts from the Topic 1 benchmark assignment. Assume that the sample risk management program you analyzed in Topic 1 was implemented and is now currently in use by your health care organization. Further assume that your supervisor has asked you to create a high‐level report of this new risk management program to share with a group of administrative personnel from a newly created community health organization in your state who have enlisted your organization's assistance in developing their own risk management policies and procedures. In a 1,000-1,250‐word report, address the following points regarding your health care organization and its risk management program: · Explain the role of your organization's Medicare Improvement for Patients and Provider Act (MIPPA)-approved accreditation body (e.g., JC, ACR, IAC) in the evaluation of your institution's quality improvement and risk management processes.  · Describe the roles that different levels of administrative personnel play in health care ethics and establishing or sustaining employer- and employee-focused organizational risk management strategies and operational policies.  · Explain how your organization's risk management and compliance programs support ethical standards, patient consent, informed consent, and patient rights and responsibilities.  · Explain the legal and ethical responsibilities health care professionals face in upholding risk management policies and administering safe health care at your organization.  · Explain how your organization's quality improvement processes support and contribute to the prevention of sentinel events and to its overall journey to excellence. · Communicate how to integrate the Christian perspective of human value and dignity, along with ethical decision-making as it relates to patients, families, and health care employees RiskManagementProgramAnalysis.docx 1 Analysis of WellSpan Health's Enterprise Risk Management Program First Name Last Name Department Name, University Course Number: Course Name Instructor's Name Due Date for Assignment Analysis of WellSpan Health's Enterprise Risk Management Program Introduction Risk management is a critical component of contemporary healthcare and provides an organizational framework to create and maintain patient safety, protect other organizational assets, and adhere to regulations. Healthcare is full of various clinical, operational, and financial risks (Pascarella et al., 2021). Therefore, a proactive, multidisciplinary risk management plan is a moral imperative as required of good stewardship. This analysis will examine the Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) program at WellSpan Health, a well-known integrated health system in Pennsylvania. Its structure, adherence to accrediting body standards, and compatibility with a worldview that promotes justice and compassion will all be evaluated, and suggestions for ongoing improvement will be made. Organization Description and Role of Risk Management WellSpan Health is an integrated delivery system that operates as a non-profit with locations in south-central Pennsylvania and northern Maryland. Its network encompasses over 1,900 employed providers, over 250 patient care facilities, including ambulatory surgery centers, primary care offices, specialty clinics, and nine acute care hospitals, including WellSpan York Hospital and WellSpan Good Samaritan Hospital (Home - WellSpan Health, n.d.). Providing a range of services from emergency care and cardiology to behavioral health and preventive screenings, WellSpan is backed by about 2,300 physicians. Each year, the organization serves over 1.2 million patients. A complex organization operating in both inpatient and ambulatory settings and serving many patients, WellSpan faces a complex risk landscape, including risks associated with clinical malpractice, data breaches, workforce safety incidents, and financial risk. The responsibility of risk management at WellSpan is thus broad and central to its mission. It operates not as an isolated department but as an enterprise-wide philosophy integrated into strategic decision-making in order to actively identify, evaluate actively, and contain risks that might be injurious to patients, employees, or the organization's capacity for delivering sustainable, high-quality care. Summary of Risk Management Plan & Rationale The particular example I selected for this analysis is "WellSpan's overall Enterprise Risk Management program , " with an emphasis on its elements pertaining to patient and employee safety. This plan or strategy was chosen because it is community-focused and audience-agnostic, and it applies to all employees, patients, and the populations that WellSpan serves. Because of its thoroughness, it offers enough depth to examine administrative procedures, adherence to regulations, and cultural effects. The ERM framework is a perfect subject for this evaluation because it provides a comprehensive view of how a large health system coordinates its risk mitigation strategies across its whole operational spectrum, unlike a limited plan that only focuses on new hires or a single department. Standard vs. Observed Administrative Processes A classic healthcare risk management program is based on a cyclical process of risk identification, analysis, treatment, and monitoring, guided by policies that are in accordance with The Joint Commission (TJC) standards and federal regulations such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) (Nair, 2024). Incident reporting systems, sentinel event root cause analyses, claims management, and required employee training are examples of standard procedures. This standard model is mirrored in WellSpan's ERM program, which improves it through formalized governance and technology integration. To ensure prompt data collection, the organization uses a centralized digital platform for reporting incidents and safety concerns. Its ERM is also managed by a special committee that answers to the Board of Directors, indicating a high level of organizational commitment that might go beyond the standard administrative procedures found in smaller organizations. Evaluation of Compliance with TJC Standards The Joint Commission, a MIPPA-approved accreditation organization, has designed strict standards for privacy (HIMM), patient safety (NPSE), and safety in the workplace (EC) (Wadhwa & Boehning, 2023). WellSpan's ERM program meets these standards virtually in full. With respect to privacy, well-developed information security measures and required training in HIPAA fit TJC's requirements to safeguard patient information. For patient safety, a culture of openness for reporting near-misses and the application of evidence-based protocols aligns with TJC's National Patient Safety Goals. For the safety of workers, WellSpan's clear policies on preventing workplace violence and safe patient handling specifically address TJC's Environment of Care standards (Home - WellSpan Health, n.d.). The program's flaw is not in its design but in the potential variability in implementing it across its large, geographically widespread network of facilities, which might lead to gaps in compliance at individual sites. Regulatory Agencies and Oversight Roles WellSpan risk management governance is a polygonal endeavor with multiple key agencies. Federally, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) impose conditions of participation, leveraging finance to obtain quality and safety standards compliance. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) governs workplace safety, examining incidents and requiring protections for healthcare professionals. The Pennsylvania Department of Health provides direct, on-the-ground oversight at the state level by conducting licensure surveys and looking into patient complaints (Hafer et al., 2025). As an external accreditor, The Joint Commission's seal of approval is frequently associated with quality and is necessary for reimbursement by many payers (Wadhwa & Boehning, 2023). Each organization has a specific role to play: CMS and TJC establish the guidelines, and state and federal agencies implement them through investigations and sanctions, forming an all-encompassing, albeit occasionally disjointed, web of oversight. Proposed Recommendations for Compliance Enhancement To bolster compliance and compliance assurance effectiveness, two key recommendations presented in the compliance plan are put forward. First, WellSpan should perform an annual system-wide compliance gap analysis. This analysis would mean conducting internal audits at each care site against each applicable TJC standard to identify and remediate discrepancies in policy application prior to an external survey. Second, I believe the organization should invest in sophisticated data analytics for its incident reporting system. By advancing from basic tracking to predictive analytics, the ERM team would be able to spot new risk trends, like an increase in falls on a particular unit or attempts by cybercriminals, and implement preventative mitigation plans instead of reactive ones. Proposed Recommendations for Cultivating a Culture of Compassion Developing a culture of compassion and concern involves deliberate strategies aligned with the Christian worldview principle of working in the common good in justice and compassion. According to me, WellSpan must officially embrace a "Just Culture" model, balancing accountability with system-based learning. This model, taught from leadership down, allows employees to feel safe reporting mistakes without fear of unfair blame, creating psychological safety and ongoing improvement (van Baarle et al., 2022). Second, leadership should make "leader rounding" mandatory for all executives and directors in order to directly demonstrate compassion. This entails planned visits to clinical settings, not for inspection, but rather to sympathetically ask staff members, "What is a safety concern you have?" and "How can we help you in your work more effectively?" A more encouraging and secure environment for patients is a direct result of this open, caring involvement, which shows sincere concern for staff welfare. Conclusion WellSpan Health's ERM program offers a comprehensive and structurally rigorous foundation for abating the various complicated risks of modern healthcare. Its alignment with regulatory standards is strong, though continuous attention is necessary to ensure consistency and reliability of application. By establishing a more predictive analytical methodology and purposefully embedding the tenets of a Just Culture and compassionate leadership, WellSpan would not only enhance its compliance but also systemically achieve its mission, producing an environment in which patients and providers truly feel safe, valued, and cared for. References Hafer, J. A., Harris, N. M., & Zander, G. (2025). Examining the process of a collaborative strategic planning initiative: The pediatric shift care initiative in Pennsylvania Medicaid. Governance. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12877 Home - WellSpan Health. (n.d.). Www.wellspan.org. https://www.wellspan.org/ Nair, A. (2024). Evaluating the Impact of Regulatory Changes on Risk Compliance in the Healthcare Sector. Shodh Sagar Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 1(4), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.36676/ssjaiml.v1.i4.25 Pascarella, G., Rossi, M., Montella, E., Capasso, A., De Feo, G., Botti, G., Nardone, A., Montuori, P., Triassi, M., D’Auria, S., & Morabito, A. (2021). Risk analysis in healthcare organizations: Methodological framework and critical variables. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, Volume 14(14), 2897–2911. Ncbi. https://doi.org/10.2147/rmhp.s309098 van Baarle, E., Hartman, L., Rooijakkers, S., Wallenburg, I., Weenink, J.-W., Bal, R., & Widdershoven, G. (2022). Fostering a Just Culture in Healthcare organizations: Experiences in Practice. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08418-z Wadhwa, R., & Boehning, A. P. (2023). The Joint Commission. PubMed; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557846/