SHORT ANSWER ASSESSMENT: please see upload | Nursing

Clinical Requirement:

please see upload SHORTANSWERASSESSMENT2.docx TO PREPARE · Review the Learning Resources for this week. · Reflect on the psychopharmacologic treatments that you have covered up to this point that may be available to treat patients with mental health disorders. · Consider the potential effects these psychopharmacologic treatments may have on co-existing mental health conditions and/or their potential effects on your patient’s overall health. TO COMPLETE: Address the following Short Answer prompts for your Assignment. Be sure to include references to the Learning Resources for this week. 1. In 3 or 4 sentences, explain the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse. Which drugs are contraindicated, if any, and why? Be specific. What is the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms? 2. List 4 predictors of late onset generalized anxiety disorder. 3. List 4 potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression. 4. An episode of major depression is defined as a period of time lasting at least 2 weeks. List at least 5 symptoms required for the episode to occur. Be specific. 5. List 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia. Be specific.  BY DAY 7 NURS_6630_Week8_Assignment1_Rubric NURS_6630_Week8_Assignment1_Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn 3 or 4 sentences, explain the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse. Which drugs are contraindicated, if any, and why. Be specific. What it is the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms? 13 to >11.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse.... The response accurately and clearly details which drugs are contraindicated with specific examples.... The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms. 11 to >10.0 pts Good Point range: 80–89 The response accurately explains the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse.... The response accurately identifies which drugs are contraindicated with specific examples.... The response accurately explains the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms. 10 to >9.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse.... The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies which drugs are contraindicated with inaccurate or vague examples.... The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms. 9 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse, or is missing.... The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies which drugs are contraindicated with inaccurate examples, or is missing.... The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms, or is missing. 13 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeList four predictors of late onset generalized anxiety disorder. 13 to >11.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 The response accurately and clearly lists in detail four predictors of late-onset generalized anxiety disorder. 11 to >10.0 pts Good Point range: 80–89 The response accurately lists four predictors of late-onset generalized anxiety disorder. 10 to >9.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 The response inaccurately or vaguely lists four predictors of late-onset generalized anxiety disorder. 9 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 The response inaccurately and vaguely lists four predictors of late-onset generalized anxiety disorder, or is missing. 13 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeList four potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression. 13 to >11.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 The response accurately and clearly lists in detail four potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression. 11 to >10.0 pts Good Point range: 80–89 The response accurately lists four potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression. 10 to >9.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 The response inaccurately or vaguely lists four potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression. 9 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 The response inaccurately and vaguely lists four potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression. 13 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAn episode of major depression is defined as a period of time lasting at least 2 weeks. List at least five symptoms required for the episode to occur. Be specific. 13 to >11.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 The response accurately and clearly explains in detail at least five symptoms for the episode of major depression to occur.... Specific examples provided fully support the response. 11 to >10.0 pts Good Point range: 80–89 The response accurately explains at least five symptoms for the episode of major depression to occur.... Specific examples provided support the response. 10 to >9.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 The response inaccurately or vaguely explains at least five symptoms for the episode of major depression to occur.... Specific examples provided inaccurately or vaguely support the response. 9 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 The response inaccurately and vaguely explains at least five symptoms for the episode of major depression to occur, or is missing.... Specific examples provided do not support the response, or is missing. 13 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeList 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia. Be specific. 13 to >11.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 The response accurately and clearly lists in detail 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia.... Examples provided fully support the response provided. 11 to >10.0 pts Good Point range: 80–89 The response accurately lists 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia.... Examples provided support the response provided. 10 to >9.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 The response inaccurately or vaguely lists 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia.... Examples provided inaccurately or vaguely support the response provided. 9 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 The response inaccurately and vaguely lists 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia, or is missing.... Examples provided do not support the response provided, or is missing. 13 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 to >3.5 pts Good Point range: 80–89 Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5 to >2.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 2 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 Uses correct APA format with no errors. 4 to >3.5 pts Good Point range: 80–89 Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. 3.5 to >2.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. 2 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. 5 pts Total Points: 75