Nursing 35 Clinical Views

Tech: see attached | Nursing

Clinical Requirement:

see attached Usetheresourceslinkedbelowtohelpcompletethisassessment.docx Use the resources linked below to help complete this assessment. Collapse All Breakthrough Technologies and Analytics These resources delve not only into the promise of predictive analytics, algorithms, machine learning, and other technologies, but also the ethical and practical questions they raise. This will be important for how you approach hazards and adverse events in Assessment 1. · Assessment 1: Breakthrough Technologies and Analytics  reading list. Interventions and Models to Improve Communication These resources provide you with detailed examples of models to improve communication and create effective interventions. They also illustrate how quality and research can be integrated. You'll see illustrations of the nature of shared decision making. This will be important to you as you analyze adverse events and near misses to understand their sources. · Assessment 1: Interventions and Models to Improve Communication  reading list. Accountability These resources explore different aspects of what it takes to build a culture of accountability. They also explore the importance of that to quality care. · Assessment 1: Accountability  reading list. Asses1.docx Prepare an analysis (5-7 pages) of an adverse event or a near miss from your professional nursing experience and outline a QI initiative that would address it. My Adverse Event - In the hospital setting previously worked at, a nurse administered the wrong dosage of medication to a patient due to a misinterpretation of the physician's handwritten prescription. The error was caught shortly after administration, and the patient does not experience any harm. However, this incident highlights the potential risks associated with manual transcription of medication orders. Collapse All Introduction Health care organizations strive to create a culture of safety. Despite technological advances, quality care initiatives, oversight, ongoing education and training, legislation, and regulations, medical errors continue to be made. Some are small and easily remedied with the patient unaware of the infraction. Others can be catastrophic and irreversible, altering the lives of patients and their caregivers and unleashing massive reforms and costly litigation. Many errors are attributable to ineffective interprofessional communication. Overview The goal of this assessment is to allow you to focus on a specific event in a health care setting that impacts patient safety and related organizational vulnerabilities and to propose a QI initiative to prevent future incidents. It will give you the chance to develop your analytical skills in the problem-solving contexts you likely find yourself in as a health care professional. Health care organizations strive for a culture of safety. Yet, despite technological advances, quality care initiatives, oversight, ongoing education and training, laws, legislation, and regulations, medical errors continue to occur. Some are small and easily remedied with the patient unaware of the infraction. Others can be catastrophic and irreversible, altering the lives of patients and their caregivers and unleashing massive reforms and costly litigation. Historically, medical errors were reported and analyzed in hindsight. Today, QI initiatives attempt to be proactive, which contributes to the amount of attention paid to adverse events and near misses. Backed up by new technologies and reporting metrics, adverse events and near misses can provide insight into potential ways to improve care delivery and ensure patient safety. For clarification, the National Quality Forum (n.d.) defines the following: · Adverse event: An event that results in unintended harm to the patient by an act of commission or omission rather than by the underlying disease or condition of the patient. · Near miss: An event or a situation that did not produce patient harm, but only because of intervening factors, such as patient health or timely intervention. Instructions Prepare a comprehensive analysis of an adverse event or a near miss from your professional nursing experience that you or a peer experienced. Provide an analysis of the impact of the same type of adverse event or near miss in other facilities. How was it managed, who was involved, and how was it resolved? Be sure to: · Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders. · Analyze the sequence of events, missed steps, or protocol deviations related to the adverse event or near miss using a root cause analysis. · Evaluate QI actions or technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety. · Evaluate how other institutions integrated solutions to prevent these types of events. · Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near miss to support need for improvement. · Outline a QI initiative to prevent a future adverse event or near miss. · Ensure your analysis conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards. Be sure your analysis addresses all of the above points. You may also want to read the Adverse Event or Near Miss Analysis Scoring Guide to better understand the performance levels that relate to each grading criterion. Additionally, be sure to review the  Guiding Questions: Adverse Event or Near Miss Analysis [DOCX]  document for additional clarification about things to consider when creating your assessment. Additional Requirements Your assessment should also meet the following requirements: · Length of submission: A minimum of five but no more than seven double-spaced, typed pages, not including the title page or References section. · Number of references: Cite a minimum of three sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans. Current source material is defined as no older than five years unless it is a seminal work. Review the  Nursing Master's Program (MSN) Library Guide  for guidance. · APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style. Review the  Evidence and APA  section of the Writing Center for guidance. Competencies Measured By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria: · Competency 1: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to adverse events and near-miss analyses. · Analyze the implications of an adverse event or a near miss for all stakeholders. · Analyze the sequence of events, missed steps, or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or a near miss using a root cause analysis. · Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent a future adverse event or near miss based on research and evidence-based practices. · Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures. · Evaluate and identify quality improvement actions or technologies related to an event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety. · Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care. · Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards. Reference National Quality Forum. (n.d.).  NQF patient safety terms and definitions. http://www.qualityforum.org/Topics/Safety_Definitions.aspx
Expert Clinical Solution Preview for Tech: see attached | Nursing

Unlock Full Solution

100% RN Verified & Plagiarism Free

APA 7th Format RN Peer Reviewed HIPAA Secure

Why order your Nursing paper here?

  • Clinical Accuracy
    Written by experts who understand nursing care models.
  • Save 40+ Hours
    Focus on your clinicals while we handle the research.
  • Perfect APA Citation
    Never lose marks for formatting or in-text citations.
  • BSN/MSN/DNP Proof
    High-level academic language suitable for your degree.

Nursing Help FAQ: Nursing

How is a nursing research paper different from regular essays?

Nursing papers, especially in Nursing, require a heavy focus on Evidence-Based Practice (EBP). This means using peer-reviewed clinical journals (less than 5 years old), adhering strictly to APA 7th edition, and demonstrating how theory applies to clinical patient outcomes.

Can you write my DNP Capstone or MSN Thesis?

Yes. We have a dedicated team for doctoral and master's level nursing work. We help with PICO-T development, methodology chapters, and comprehensive literature reviews that meet university-level rigor.

What if I need my nursing paper in APA 7 format?

APA 7th edition is our default clinical language. We ensure perfect title pages, running heads, headings (Levels 1-5), and a comprehensive reference list with active DOIs.

Related Clinical Studies

Case: Nursing

450Topic 4 DQ 1: Describe the impact of policies on... | Nursing

Describe the impact of policies on population outcomes, including social justice and health equity. Select one policy that addresses the population outcomes, social justice, or health equity and suggest a communication platform for sharing the information with stakeholders. Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to "RN-BSN...

Case: Nursing

Pwp ass Ay: Assume that you are leading a staff... | Nursing

Assume that you are leading a staff development meeting on regulation for nursing practice at your healthcare organization or agency. Review the NCSBN and ANA websites to prepare for your presentation. The Assignment: (8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation) Develop a 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint Presentation that addresses the following: Describe the differences between a board of nursing and a professional nurse association. Describe the board for your specific region/area. Who is on the boa...

Case: Nursing

Week 4: Informatics has changed dramatically in... | Nursing

Informatics has changed dramatically in the past 10 years. The changes in health care alone have forced organizations to do things far differently than they once imagined. Scenario You are a member of a planning committee in your organization whose purpose is to research and report on future trends in the field of informatics. You will look at future trends in informatics that can improve your organization’s health care strategy and day-to-day patient care. In addition, you will consider how the...

Case: Nursing

The Integrative Literature Review

Perform a literature review using a minimum of seven (7) peer-reviewed articles and books, as well as non-research literature such as evidence-based guidelines, toolkits, standardized procedures, etc. Review of areas in relationship to medicine, nursing, public health, etc. The review should be critical and synthesize rather than just being a catalog of studies. Summarize the key findings of the research and its relevancy to your project that point out the scientific status of the phenome...

Case: Nursing

week 10: attached find the question  | Nursing

attached find the question  USW1_NURS_6050_HealthcareProgram-PolicyEvaluationAnalysisTemplate.doc [removed] week10.docx To Prepare: Review the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template provided in the Resources. Select an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation or choose one of interest to you. Review community, state, or federal policy evaluation and reflect on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program or policy described. The Assignment: (2–3 pages)...

Case: Nursing

see below: KE  4030 assessment 3   Create a 3-5... | Nursing

KE  4030 assessment 3   Create a 3-5 page submission in which you develop a PICO(T) question for the diagnosis you worked with in the first two assessments and evaluate the evidence you locate, which could help to answer the question. Collapse All Introduction PICO(T) is an acronym that helps researchers and practitioners define aspects of a potential study or investigation. It stands for: P - Patient/population/problem. I - Intervention. C - Comparison (of potential interventions, typically)....

Case: Nursing

Discussion #5 Follow 2: Reply if you agree or disagree with the... | Nursing

Reply if you agree or disagree with the following post. 200 words. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Self-efficacy theory, internal and external criticism evaluation process.       In order to provide a clearer understanding of this topic, let me begin by explaining the theory of "Self-efficacy.” According to Bandura (1977), efficacy beliefs play a significant role in predicting changes in human behavior. Efficacy beliefs refer to an individua...

Case: Nursing

Stakeholder Presentation: Files attached below, thank you! | Nursing

Files attached below, thank you!

Case: Nursing

WK 5 PROJECT DOCUMENTS CONT

WK5ProjectsDocumentscont.docx Develop SMART objectives you want your participants to accomplish from this DNP project  (DONE BY GERRY) Complete the ADDIE tool (DONE BY GERRY) WILL UPLOAD BOTH DOCUMENTS. START FROM HERE PLEASE 1) Make Power Point slides that you are going to present to them during this ~ 1-hour education session on your topic of early recognition of staff burnout in nurses working in long-term care Handouts you are going to give to them duri...