week 8: Please see attached | Nursing

Clinical Requirement:

Please see attached week8.docx Topic: Childhood-Onset Fluency Disorder (Stuttering) The Assignment Create a study guide for your assigned disorder. Your study guide should be in the form of an outline with references, and you should incorporate visual elements such as concept maps, charts, diagrams, images, color coding, mnemonics, and/or flashcards. Be creative! It should not be in the format of an APA paper. Your guide should be informed by the  DSM-5-TR but also supported by at least three other scholarly resources. Areas of importance you should address, but are not limited to, are: · Signs and symptoms according to the  DSM-5-TR · Differential diagnoses · Incidence · Development and course · Prognosis · Considerations related to culture, gender, age · Pharmacological treatments, including any side effects · Nonpharmacological treatments · Diagnostics and labs · Comorbidities · Legal and ethical considerations · Pertinent patient education considerations. · NRNP_6665_Week8_Assignment_Rubric NRNP_6665_Week8_Assignment_Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreate a study guide, in outline form with references, for your assigned disorder. Incorporate visual elements such as concept maps, charts, diagrams, images, color coding, mnemonics, and/or flashcards. 30 to >26.0 pts Excellent The response is in a well-organized and detailed outline form. Informative and well-designed visual elements are incorporated....Followed directions correctly by uploading assignment to Gradebook and submitted to the discussion forum area. 26 to >23.0 pts Good The response is in an organized and detailed outline form. Appropriate visual elements are incorporated....Partially followed directions by uploading assignment to Gradebook but did not submit to the discussion forum area. 23 to >20.0 pts Fair The response is in outline form, with some inaccuracies or details missing. Visual elements are somewhat vague or inaccurate....Partially followed directions by submitting to the discussion forum area but did not upload assignment to Gradebook. 20 to >0 pts Poor The response is unorganized, not in outline form, or is missing. Visual elements are inaccurate or missing....Did not follow directions as did not submit to discussion forum area and did not upload assignment to gradebook per late policy. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent areas of importance you should address, but are not limited to, are:• Signs and symptoms according to the DSM-5-TR• Differential diagnoses• Incidence• Development and course• Prognosis• Considerations related to culture, gender, age• Pharmacological treatments, including any side effects• Nonpharmacological treatments• Diagnostics and labs• Comorbidities• Legal and ethical considerations• Pertinent patient education considerations 50 to >44.0 pts Excellent The response throughly addresses all required content areas. 44 to >39.0 pts Good The response adequately addresses all required content areas. Minor details may be missing. 39 to >34.0 pts Fair The response addresses all required content areas, with some inaccuracies or vagueness. No more than one or two content areas are missing. 34 to >0 pts Poor The response vaguely or inaccurately addresses the required content areas. Or, three or more content areas are missing. 50 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport your guide with references to the DSM-5-TR and at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines. Be sure they are current (no more than 5 years old). 10 to >8.0 pts Excellent The response is supported by the DSM-5 and at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature. 8 to >7.0 pts Good The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature that appropriately support the assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study. 7 to >6.0 pts Fair Three evidence-based resources are provided to support assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, but they may only provide vague or weak justification. 6 to >0 pts Poor Two or fewer resources are provided to support assessment and diagnosis decisions. The resources may not be current or evidence based. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors 4 to >3.5 pts Good Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors 3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors 3 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The guide follows correct APA format for parenthetical/narrative in-text citations and reference list. 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct APA format with no errors 4 to >3.5 pts Good Contains one or two APA format errors 3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Contains several (three or four) APA format errors 3 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (five or more) APA format errors 5 pts Total Points: 100 · Previous Next