Nursing WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT

Clinical Requirement:

Nursing Ethics   Module3AssignmentQuestion.docx Nursing Ethics Paper Write a 2000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least six (6) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment. This week you will write a paper exploring nursing ethics and how they inform your DNP project. Be sure to include: · What area of nursing ethics pertains to your DNP practice problem? · How will you address this ethical concern? In a 2000-word paper, discuss the ethics related to your DNP project. What type of scenarios might you run into, and how will you overcome them?  · Finally, describe how you will adopt and maintain ethical principles and the beneficence of others within your DNP projects. Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment. References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least six (6) scholarly sources to support your claims. Scholarly articles from 2020 to 2025 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric. Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal. Resources Finkelman, A. (2023). Professional nursing concepts: Competencies for quality leadership 5th ed.).Jones & Bartlett Learning. Read chapters 5 & 6. Chism, L. A. (2023). The doctor of nursing practice: A guidebook for role development and professional nursing practice (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. Read chapters 5 & 7. Additional Resources American Association of Nurse Practitioners.(2021). AANP Advocacy Center. https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/advocacycenter American Nurses Association (ANA). (2021). Health policy. https://www.nursingworld.org/practicepolicy/health-policy/ American Nurses Association. (2015). Code ofethics for nurses. https://www. nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursingexcellence/ethics/code-of-ethics-fornurses/coe-view-only Module3AssignmentQuestion.docx Nursing Ethics Paper Write a 2000-word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least six (6) sources in your essay. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment. This week you will write a paper exploring nursing ethics and how they inform your DNP project. Be sure to include: · What area of nursing ethics pertains to your DNP practice problem? · How will you address this ethical concern? In a 2000-word paper, discuss the ethics related to your DNP project. What type of scenarios might you run into, and how will you overcome them?  · Finally, describe how you will adopt and maintain ethical principles and the beneficence of others within your DNP projects. Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count toward the minimum word amount for this assignment. References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least six (6) scholarly sources to support your claims. Scholarly articles from 2020 to 2025 only. (Within the last five years) Please review your spelling and the rubric. Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal. Resources Finkelman, A. (2023). Professional nursing concepts: Competencies for quality leadership 5th ed.).Jones & Bartlett Learning. Read chapters 5 & 6. Chism, L. A. (2023). The doctor of nursing practice: A guidebook for role development and professional nursing practice (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. Read chapters 5 & 7. Additional Resources American Association of Nurse Practitioners.(2021). AANP Advocacy Center. https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/advocacycenter American Nurses Association (ANA). (2021). Health policy. https://www.nursingworld.org/practicepolicy/health-policy/ American Nurses Association. (2015). Code ofethics for nurses. https://www. nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursingexcellence/ethics/code-of-ethics-fornurses/coe-view-only “My DNP project aims to enhance glycemic control in Black adults aged 40–70 years with uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes (HbA1c ≥9%) within a community-based primary care clinic by increasing the use of Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGMs)”. Module3Assignment-Rubric.docx 10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 - DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship - Aspen University Classroom 10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 - DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship - Aspen University Classroom 10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 - DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship - Aspen University Classroom Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 Course: DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship Criteria Does Not Meet 0% Approaches 70% Meets 80% Exceeds 100% Criterion Score Content Weight: 30 % / 30 0 points Topic is inappropri - ate to assignment, inaccurate under - standing of con - cepts, unclear and difficult to under - stand; does not ad - dress many assign - ment requirements. Information has weak or no connec - tion to the assign - ment topic. 21 points Topic is mostly cov - ered and appropri - ate to assignment, but does not ade - quately demonstrate accurate under - standing of con - cepts; mostly clear and understandable; lacks some of the requirements of the assignment descrip - tion and/or provides little detail; Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. points 24 Topic is covered completely and ap - propriate to assign - ment; overview of key concept dimen - sions is evident; clear and under - standable; ad - dresses all of the re - quirements of the assignment descrip - tion, with adequate attention to detail. 30 points In-depth coverage of topic; outstand - ing clarity and ex - planation of con - cepts demonstrated in information pre - sented; approaches assignment with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using clear and fo - cused details. Organization Weight: 25% 0 points Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas. Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant. 17.5 points Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. 20 points Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework. Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. 25 points Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms. Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. / 25 Logic/Argument Weight: 15% 0 points Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. 10.5 points Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak. 12 points Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. 15 points Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. / 15 Support Weight: 20% 0 points Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. APA format and style are not evident. 14 points Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced. 16 points Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style. 20 points Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident. / 20 Total / 100 Quality of Written Communication Weight: 10% / 10 0 points Style and voice inap - propriate or do not address given audi - ence, purpose, etc. Word choice is ex - cessively redundant, clichéd, and unspe - cific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. points 7 Style and voice are somewhat appropri - ate to given audi - ence and purpose. Word choice is of - ten unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd. Repetitive mechani - cal errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. 8 points Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typo - graphical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appro - priate language are used. points 10 Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audi - ence and purpose, but also show origi - nality and creativity. Word choice is spe - cific, purposeful, dy - namic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of stan - dard, written, aca - demic English. 10/6/25, 10:08 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate Simple Essay Rubric v1 - DNP850 Sect1 Nursing Practice, Professionalism, and Scholarship - Aspen University Classroom Criteria Does Not Meet 0% Approaches 70% Meets 80% Exceeds 100% Criterion Score 10/6/25, 10:08 PM Criteria Does Not Meet 0% Approaches 70% Meets 80% Exceeds 100% Criterion Score 1/5 https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5 1/5 Overall Score Level 1 0 points minimum Level 2 70 points minimum Level 3 80 points minimum Level 4 100 points minimum https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5 https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5 https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/114903/viewContent/6049693/View 1/5