week9: please see attached. | Nursing

Clinical Requirement:

please see attached. week9.docx To Prepare · Review this week’s Learning Resources on dissociative disorders. · Use the Walden Library to investigate the controversy regarding dissociative disorders. Locate at least three scholarly articles that you can use to support your Assignment.  The Assignment (2–3 pages) · Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders. · Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from literature. · Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. · Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important. NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn 2–3 pages, address the following:• Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders. 15 to >13.0 pts Excellent The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. 13 to >11.0 pts Good The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. 11 to >10.0 pts Fair The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. 10 to >0 pts Poor The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Or the response is missing. 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature. 25 to >22.0 pts Excellent The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student's professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references. 22 to >19.0 pts Good The response includes a well-organized explanation of the student's professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references. 19 to >17.0 pts Fair The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student's professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current. 17 to >0 pts Poor The response includes a vague explanation of the student's professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. 30 to >26.0 pts Excellent The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. 26 to >23.0 pts Good The response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. 23 to >20.0 pts Fair The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. 20 to >0 pts Poor The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Or the response is missing. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important. 15 to >13.0 pts Excellent The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. 13 to >11.0 pts Good The response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. 11 to >10.0 pts Fair The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. 10 to >0 pts Poor The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing. 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. 4 to >3.5 pts Good Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. 3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. 3 to >0 pts Poor Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors 4 to >3.5 pts Good Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors 3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Contains three or four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors 3 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct APA format with no errors 4 to >3.5 pts Good Contains one or two APA format errors 3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Contains three or four APA format errors 3 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (five or more) APA format errors 5 pts Total Points: 100 · Previous Next